Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Government Should Not Drug Testing Welfare Recipients

Public welfare is the term which stands for the variety of tax-supported programs that provide cash assistance or services to residents who are not able to financially take care of themselves (Hansan, 2011). This program was started in the 1930’s during the Great Depression. There are several types of welfare including health care, food stamps, child care assistance, cash aid, and housing assistance. Medicaid is considered to be one of the welfare programs; it is a medical care that provides cash income assistance for the poor (â€Å"Medicaid†, 2002). Recipients must meet multiple requirements that are established prior to receiving aid. The requirements include low income, child dependency, family size, and any crisis situation such as pregnancy, unemployment, and medical emergencies (Welfare Information, n.d.). As of today, some states require welfare recipients to get drug tested when applying for financial benefits. Arguments arose whether the test should take place or not. Many people believe that the government should not drug test welfare recipients because unpleasant consequences occur. Not only does drug testing recipients create chaos in the U.S. bureaucratic system, it also labels the recipients, creating stigma and deviance especially if the test comes out positive. Welfare recipients are being discriminated by society and this may lead to knowledge gaps between the underclass and other social classes which creates a caste system. Many negative effects take place asShow MoreRelatedMandatory Drug Testing Should Be Banned1365 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Mandatory drug testing has been and ongoing controversial issue over the most recent years. Mandatory drug testing has been subjected to students, athletes, and employees all over the country. However a lot of speculation has been made whether or not welfare recipients in particular should be subjected to mandatory drug testing. According to Besonen, programs such as welfare were created in the 1930s to temporarily aid struggling Americans to help get them back up on their feet. (BesonenRead MoreDrug Testing Welfare Recipients Should Not Be Drug Tested911 Words   |  4 PagesDrug Testing Welfare Recipients To test or not to test has been has been the question at hand for many states that are dealing with whether or not to pass the law that welfare recipients should or should not be drug tested in order to receive assistance from the government. Florida was the first state to mandate the law in 2011 and thereafter twenty four other states in the last year have also passed this law with our own state of Oklahoma being one of them. Although alcohol is legal it is abusedRead MoreDrug Testing : A Controversial Issue Right Now1439 Words   |  6 PagesRUNNING HEAD: Mandatorily Drug Testing Welfare Recipients Does More Harm Than Good Mandatorily Drug Testing Welfare Recipients Does More Harm Than Good Clare M. Pitlik Marist High School Author Note First paragraph: Introduction to history of drug testing welfare recipients Second paragraph: Explains why drug testing welfare recipients is unconstitutional Third paragraph: Explains why drug testing welfare recipients is costly Fourth paragraph: Rebuttals Fifth paragraph:Read MoreThe Welfare Recipients Should Not Be Drug Tested907 Words   |  4 Pagesstates that are dealing with whether or not to pass the law that welfare recipients should or should not be drug tested in order to receive assistance from the government. Florida was the first state to mandate the law in 2011 and thereafter twenty four other states in the last year have also passed this law with our own state of Oklahoma being one of them. Although alcohol is legal it is abused far more than marijuana or hard core drugs, According to the 1996 study by the National Institute of AlcoholRead MoreWelfare Drug Testing Should Not Be Allowed1416 Words   |  6 PagesAmericans on welfare, and the U.S spending over 131 billion on welfare annually, not including food stamps. People have been looking for a way to cut the costs of welfare for many years. And then Welfare drug testing was proposed. At initial thought it seemed like a grand idea and a great way to cut costs and to eliminate all the drug users in the system, and because of that welfare drug testing has been put into action in 13 states. But, welfare drug testing is completely ineffective. Welfare drug testingRead MoreWelfare Drug Testing Essay1383 Words   |  6 PagesWelfare Drug Testing Trevor Brooks, SOC 110 11/09/2011 In today’s America, government aid is highly depended on. The US government has spent $498 billion dollars this year on welfare alone. The state of Tennessee has an average of 250,000 residents on welfare and has $3 billion dollars this year alone. To help cut costs and help tax payers, 36 states, including Tennessee, have proposed a bill to drug test all welfare recipients. Since the beginning of the year, the welfare rateRead MoreWelfare Recipients Drug Tested1311 Words   |  6 PagesThere has been an ongoing controversy as to whether welfare recipients should have to have drug testing done. Drug testing will ensure that recipients will not abuse the money they’re given by the government. Having people on welfare take drug test is advantageous because it could save the system money, it would help social workers identify children who are around drug abuse, and it would deter people from purchasing and using illegal drugs; however, it does have a downside such a s people who areRead MoreDrug Testing the Less Fortunate 1023 Words   |  4 PagesShould drug testing be a necessity for all state and federal aid programs? Drug testing welfare recipients have been a major issue across the United States for a few years now. Many indicate that if working class people are subject to a test prior to hire or randomly during the duration of employment, why should those that don’t have to work for money not have the same treatment? The government estimated that random annual drug testing for welfare recipients would cost each taxpayer an additionalRead MoreThe Drug Of Drug Testing Welfare Recipients912 Words   |  4 PagesDrug Testing Welfare Recipients To test or not to test has been has been the question at hand for many states that are dealing with whether or not to pass the law that welfare recipients should or should not be drug tested in order to receive assistance from the government. Florida was the first state to mandate the law in 2011 and thereafter twenty four other states in the last year have also passed this law in our own state of Oklahoma being one of them. Although alcohol is legal it is abused farRead MorePeople Collecting Welfare Should Undergo Testing804 Words   |  3 PagesPeople collecting welfare should undergo drug testing to get the money the government is giving them, because it makes welfare applicants go down at least 48 percent, it also will help the national debt go down and help people with their drug problems. There are many benefits of drug testing welfare recipients. Floridas policy of requiring drug testing for welfare applicants appears to have reduced new welfare enrollments by as much as 48 percent. Welfare recipients in Florida now will have to

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Asking for Less Homework Free Essays

ASKING FOR LESS HOMEWORK There are many important things in life but one of the most important things is education. Although education is really helpful, getting extra things to do like excessive homework makes it boring. Specific studies show that excessive homework makes students and parents hate school. We will write a custom essay sample on Asking for Less Homework or any similar topic only for you Order Now People say that having more homework is good for students as it helps them get higher marks and be more responsible. They also say that more homework will make students revise a lot, so you remember explanations better. They prove that by doing more homework the parents would be able to get involved more with the student’s educational life and be able to help them. Elders think that by giving students extra homework they will be able to be independent thinkers and know that they can learn things outside of school. However, I found that all these above findings are untrue. More homework won’t make you revise more or get good marks, it will make you tired, sleepy and exhausted and leave no time to revise for quizzes or tests you have on the next day. Students don’t want to be responsible now, in their future life they will be responsible. Parents would make it worse if they try to help their children to understand something as they might explain it in a different way and get the child confused. Students should have less homework. They need time to be with their family. They want to have a life for themselves and want to be active e. g going to the cinema to meet friends and play sports. We would enjoy simple things like having more sleep so we can go to school fresh the next day. Read also  Homework Solutions – Chapter 3 Researchers have found that students finish their homework and stay up late at night so they can have some free time. In fact some teachers have found that more homework makes the student hate the subject. The student becomes pale and bored as he has been studying his whole life. Well, teachers should ask themselves if they want us to be active and do homework together, it will never work. Ask yourself : â€Å"Do you want your child to be constantly pale, sleepy and tired? â€Å",†Do you want to see your child so fat as he eats and eats and doesn’t have time to exercise? . Think of all the questions related to this and you will find the answer to none of them. In conclusion, I would like the school to think about students rights and having less homework is one of them. All principals should remember that teens and kids want to have fun, they don’t want to be responsible now and do hard work. They will be responsible later and will have to do extra study to get g ood marks but when they want not by forcing them and punishing them if they don’t do it. Think carefully and you will eventually agree with my beliefs. How to cite Asking for Less Homework, Essay examples

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Organization Into Decision Making Process †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Organization Into Decision Making Process? Answer: Introducation Stakeholder engagement is the process of involving relevant shareholder of any corporate organization into the decision making process. The overall performance of the business and resultant outcome decides the profitability earned annually which is partially received by the shareholders in form of dividend payment. Moreover, the shareholders of the organization are the people collectively providing fund to the company for running its busyness operation or paying for any strategic expansion or planning. They from the credibility of the company as a public company enlisted in the national stock exchange. Therefore, inclusion of them into the business operation and planning is of pivotal importance as any implementation or change in decision can further impact their decision of investment and operation within the organization (Bal et al., 2013). This is one of the major component of Corporate Social Responsibility and requirement of the Global Reporting Initiative. The organization enters into conversations with the stakeholders in order to identify their notion on the current operation or level of satisfaction or any other deviation in the opinion possessed by them (Strand Freeman, 2015). The following are the principles undertaken by the corporate authorities in order to make stakeholder engagement highly efficient and profitable for the business marketing keeping up the social responsibilities they have as corporate entity. Communication: Communication between organization and stakeholders is important to influence the stakeholder thoughts and for that understanding the people and gaining information are the first step to achieve (ORiordan Fairbrass, 2014) Consultation: Early and regular consultation about any project help the shareholder assesses the importance, potential or even possibility of risk associated with it. This clears informational ambiguity. Treating well: Being human, the stakeholder might differ on their opinion of fall short of rationality, predictability or even sense of reasoning. In such cases, the authority requires to be more understanding in order to include their opinion since there are the source of potential risk or opportunity. Good Planning: A well-planned stakeholder engagement operated through integrated and conscientious approach encourages greater stakeholder engagement, which further brings forth higher investment possibility and benefits to the organization. Corporate governance of any company includes the rules and regulation that helps to control and run the business and the role of stakeholders is important as their interests along with other factors of management shapes the corporate governance as a whole. Stakeholder relationship with organization and principles regarding the management of their relation is now most important component of the corporate governance amidst the growing world of business operations (Ayuso et al., 2014). This has important implication for developing communication strategy for communication among all organizations. Inclusion of stakeholders exposes the company to more opportunity and risk factors stemming from randomness of their behavior and opinion, which have influence on the business internally as well as externally for maintaining corporate sustainability. The importance of the stakeholders in the corporate organization lies in the managerial decision making which further reflects into the broader business strategy and planning to bring long term growth and promote expansion in the business. References Ayuso, S., Rodrguez, M. A., Garca-Castro, R., Ario, M. A. (2014). Maximizing stakeholders interests: An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance.Business society,53(3), 414-439. Bal, M., Bryde, D., Fearon, D., Ochieng, E. (2013). Stakeholder management: Achieving sustainability in the construction sector.Sustainability,5(2), 695-710. ORiordan, L., Fairbrass, J. (2014). Managing CSR stakeholder engagement: A new conceptual framework.Journal of Business Ethics,125(1), 121-145. Strand, R., Freeman, R. E. (2015). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia.Journal of business ethics,127(1), 65-85.